SUPREME COURT POSER ON SPURT IN VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN : A REJOINDER

RECENTLY,THE HIGHEST COURT IN THE COUNTRY PUT FORWARD A QUESTION :-THAT WHY THERE IS SPURT IN CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN AND WHETHER THE LEGAL SYSTEM HAS GONE WHILE WRONG TACKLING THIS ISSUES.


FIRSTLY,IT SEEM'S THAT ONE NEED TO GO EITHER ON THE NATIONAL T.V OR TO CLIMB A MOUNTAIN AND  SHOUT.BECAUSE  AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN MATERIALS ON SOCIAL MEDIA LIKE  '' YOU TUBE '' AND ''FACEBOOK'' ARE DEFINATELY ONE OF THE VARIOUS REASONS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ABNORMAL RISE IN CRIME AGAINST WOMEN.AND NO ONE SEEM TO CARE OR TALK ABOUT.

HAVE THE REGULATING AUTHORITIES INCLUDING THE SUPREME COURT GONE BLIND.THEY ARE NOT ABLE TO SEE THIS THEMSELVES.

THERE MUST BE SOME WAYS TO PREVENT OR REGULATE THE REACH OF VIOLENT AND OBSCENE MEDIA TO THE REACH OF UNMATURE MEN( BOTH JUVENILE AND MAJOR'S ).

THE FACT IS ,THESE INTERNET BASED SITES ARE A PRODUCT RELATED WITH G.MAIL.AND IT IS THE MOST DEVELOPING FORM OF COMMUNICATION AT PRESENT IN THE COUNTRY.HENCE,UNSUSPECTING USERS ALSO GET USED TO THESE.

SECONDLY, THE JUDICIARY IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR RISE IN THESE INCIDENTS.THERE IS NO FEAR OF LAW IN THE COUNTRY,AT LEAST THE FIGURES OF THESE CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN SUGGEST SO.

THE LEGAL SYSTEM !!!.WHERE DOES THE SYSTEM EXIST IN THE 1ST PLACE.THE LEGAL PROCESS ITSELF HAS BECOME JUNK,OUTDATED.INVESTIGATIONS ARE POOR,HALF HEARTED AND TIME TAKING PROCESS.

MOST OF THE TIMES,POLICE AND LAWYERS ARE SEEN HAND IN GLOVE WITH THE CULPRITS INSTEAD OF THE VICTIMS.THE RESULT IS......99% OF THE CASES FILED ARE ACQUITTALS FOR THE ACCUSED,WHO MOVE ON MOSTLY AGAIN, TO COMMIT THE SAME CRIME WITH NO SUCH FEAR OF LAW.

99% OF THESE CASES ARE DILUTED DURING THE INVESTIGATION OR DURING THE TRIAL .THERE ARE LAWS BUT HERE ONE WOULD LIKE TO RECALL A OLD PROVERB.

IT SAY'S .........TOO MANY COOKS SPOIL EVEN THE BEST QUALITY OF RICE.


THAT'S THE CASE.


DIFFERENT LAWS ARE INTERPRETED TO REGISTER THESE CASES FROM DIFFERENT VIEWS.


LASTLY,WHAT DOES THE COURT WISH TO DO ?      WILL THE COURT ACT ?  PERHAPS NOT.    BECAUSE THE HIGHEST COURT OF THE LAND IS OCCUPIED WITH IT'S OVER ACTIVENESS ON ISSUES WHERE IT SHOULD NOT.


WHERE THE COURT SHOULD BE OVER ACTIVE IT REMAINS SUBDUED AND HELPLESS.BECAUSE IT CAN ONLY PASS OUT ORDER.IMPLEMENTATION CAN BE DONE  ONLY BY THE GOVT. AGENCIES.